Revisable Justified Belief: Preliminary Report

نویسندگان

  • Alexandru Baltag
  • Bryan Renne
  • Sonja Smets
چکیده

The theory CDL of Conditional Doxastic Logic is the single-agent version of Board’s multi-agent theory BRSIC of conditional belief. CDL may be viewed as a version of AGM belief revision theory in which Boolean combinations of revisions are expressible in the language. We introduce a theory JCDL of Justified Conditional Doxastic Logic that replaces conditional belief formulas Bφ by expressions t :φ made up of a term t whose syntactic structure suggests a derivation of the belief φ after revision by ψ. This allows us to think of terms t as reasons justifying a belief in various formulas after a revision takes place. We show that JCDL-theorems are the exact analogs of CDL-theorems, and that this result holds the other way around as well. This allows us to think of JCDL as a theory of revisable justified belief.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Contradiction: When Avoidance Equals Removal - Part II

This paper is the continuation of 1] in this volume. There we present a sceptical semantics which avoids contradiction for extended logic programs plus integrity contraints in the form of denials, based on the notion of optative hypotheses {an abductive approach. In this part we deene a program revision method for removing contradiction from contradictory programs under WFSX, based on the notio...

متن کامل

Gettier and Justified True Belief

This report will be divided into three sections. The first will contain a description of the idea of knowledge as justified true belief (JBT) and the Gettier and Gettier-style objections to it. The second will describe a number of attempts to fix the Gettier problem from a variety of angles, and the third will briefly address the broader question of why this subject has proven so seemingly intr...

متن کامل

Towards Incremental LexicalAcquisition in

In this paper we present an implemented system for the incremental acquisition and revision of lexical entries in HPSG. As a byproduct of parsing, linguistic properties of unknown words are inferred from their sentential context. After parsing, the corresponding lexical entries are updated accordingly. A key idea of our approach is to employ a gradual, information-based concept of \unknownness"...

متن کامل

The folk conception of knowledge.

How do people decide which claims should be considered mere beliefs and which count as knowledge? Although little is known about how people attribute knowledge to others, philosophical debate about the nature of knowledge may provide a starting point. Traditionally, a belief that is both true and justified was thought to constitute knowledge. However, philosophers now agree that this account is...

متن کامل

On what inferentially justifies what: the vices of reliabilism and proper functionalism

Yet there are restrictions: a justified belief can inferentially justify a belief in some propositions but not others. Suppose I justifiably believe (J) that Jones ate pizza last night. My justified belief in J can, by itself, inferentially justify me in believing (S) that someone ate pizza last night. 2 Maybe I won’t be justified in believing S because I have a defeater. But S is at least a ca...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1503.08141  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015